================ @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +# REQUIRES: aarch64 + +# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=aarch64 %s -o %t.o +# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %t +# RUN: llvm-readelf -s -r %t | FileCheck %s +# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %t -pie +# RUN: llvm-readelf -s -r %t | FileCheck %s +# RUN: not ld.lld %t.o -o %t -shared 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=ERR %s + +.data +# CHECK: R_AARCH64_IRELATIVE [[FOO:[0-9a-f]*]] +# ERR: relocation R_AARCH64_FUNCINIT64 cannot be used against preemptible symbol 'foo' +.8byte foo@FUNCINIT ---------------- smithp35 wrote:
Although not this patch, MaskRay is proposing that we use a different syntax for relocation specifiers to avoid ambiguity with the addend: https://maskray.me/blog/2025-03-16-relocation-generation-in-assemblers I'm proposing that aarch64 ELF follows this for data relocation specifiers (first one in https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/pull/330/files#diff-c74a0dce6771ac7b499e84c140122aaa972bd9d63aed84863e675ecc9b4b2c32R659) I'm assuming that we could migrate to this syntax at a later date if needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133531 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
