jmciver wrote: @dtcxzyw I was not aware I should be using a fuzzer. What tool would you recommend?
>From a correctness standpoint the match is relatively narrow and I have >discussed with @nlopes extensively. The patch has been tested with bootstrap >build of LLVM running all regressions. Additionally I have used the >llvm-test-suite for correctness checks. I have sent a request to @nikita asking for compile-time tracker access and can report results once available. I also have used the patch in conjunction with 15+ Phoronix benchmarks. The optimization involving the fold of global is something I have seen in our memory semantics work in testing FFTW. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129776 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
