jofrn wrote:

> As a general comment, I find it difficult to review a series of PRs where the 
> intermediate state between them is broken, and without any clear indication 
> as to what is and isn't supposed to work after each PR.

The tests posted in the review work from that point on, except for when the 
atomics are lowered to calls in #120387 ; these have always worked. I'm posting 
another review to handle more cases.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120385
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to