================
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+//===-- NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch.h ------------------*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef lldb_NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch_h
+#define lldb_NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch_h
+
+#include "Plugins/Process/Utility/NativeRegisterContextDBReg.h"
+
+namespace lldb_private {
+
+class NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch : public NativeRegisterContextDBReg
{
+public:
+ explicit NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch(uint32_t enable_bit)
----------------
wangleiat wrote:
> Maybe I should give more context so we are on the same page:
>
> ```
> class NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch : public
> NativeRegisterContextDBReg {
> public:
> explicit NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch()
> : NativeRegisterContextDBReg(<enable_bit_value>) {}
> ```
>
> Though the `explicit` is probably redundant or invalid when there are no
> constructor arguments.
>
> The point is that all calls to `NativeRegisterContextDBReg_loongarch(` would
> be passing the same value for enable_it.
>
> Is doing that giving you the same error? I will try it locally, maybe I have
> misunderstood the code.
Sorry, I didn't fully understand your point earlier. This works fine now and
has passed the LoongArch tests. Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118770
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
