================
@@ -1166,9 +1166,10 @@ def TargetOp : OpenMP_Op<"target", traits = [
   ], clauses = [
     // TODO: Complete clause list (defaultmap, uses_allocators).
     OpenMP_AllocateClause, OpenMP_DependClause, OpenMP_DeviceClause,
-    OpenMP_HasDeviceAddrClause, OpenMP_IfClause, OpenMP_InReductionClause,
-    OpenMP_IsDevicePtrClause, OpenMP_MapClauseSkip<assemblyFormat = true>,
-    OpenMP_NowaitClause, OpenMP_PrivateClause, OpenMP_ThreadLimitClause
+    OpenMP_HasDeviceAddrClause, OpenMP_HostEvalClause, OpenMP_IfClause,
----------------
skatrak wrote:

Thank you Anchu for taking a look!

I don't think it would be a good idea to modify the dialect prefix (`OpenMP_`) 
here, since it's intended to represent a sort of namespace for all definitions 
of the dialect 
(https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/DefiningDialects/Operations/#class-name-and-namespaces).

The `host_eval` clause is only used for `omp.target`, so it could be integrated 
into that operation's definition rather than defined as its own thing. However, 
this would make the operation less readable and the automatically-generated 
operand structure for it wouldn't have information for these operands, making 
its constructor and Flang lowering code slightly more convoluted. Another case 
of this is the `OpenMP_LoopRelatedClause` definition, which is only used by a 
single operation and does not refer to an actual clause in the spec.

In my opinion, the advantages of having these pseudo-clauses defined as clauses 
outweighs the potential inconvenience of making readers have to look at their 
definition to realize what they represent. Perhaps a name change like 
"LoopRelatedClause -> LoopRelatedPseudoClause" and "HostEvalClause -> 
HostEvalPseudoClause" can point out this difference without changing the 
structure, but I'm not sure that this distinction is very useful. Let me know 
what you think.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116049
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to