================
@@ -23,8 +24,8 @@ void f(int m) {
}
// CHECK: TypeSanitizer: type-aliasing-violation on address
- // CHECK-NEXT: READ of size 2 at {{.+}} with type short accesses an existing
object of type long long
- // CHECK-NEXT: in f violation-pr47137.c:30
+ // CHECK-NEXT: READ of size 2 at {{.+}} with type short accesses an existing
object of type {{(long)+}}
----------------
jmorse wrote:
IMO having an optional (with `?`) long is preferable to having an unbound
number of longs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96507
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
