jhuber6 wrote:

Overall I think the patch is fine pending some naming nits, my one concern is 
the `-U__GLIBCXX` stuff, because undefining internal vars seems really sketchy. 
Do we use `-nostdlib++` to make sure we don't link the C++ library?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110217
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Valentin Clement バレンタイン クレメン via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Valentin Clement バレンタイン クレメン via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Valentin Clement バレンタイン クレメン via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Michael Kruse via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Michael Kruse via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Michael Kruse via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Michael Kruse via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Michael Kruse via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Michael Kruse via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... Joseph Huber via llvm-branch-commits
  • [... via llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to