================ @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +## Tests stale block matching with pseudo probes. + +# REQUIRES: system-linux +# RUN: split-file %s %t +# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %t/main.s -o %t.o +# RUN: %clang %cflags %t.o -o %t.exe -Wl,-q -nostdlib +# RUN: llvm-bolt %t.exe -o %t.out --data %t/yaml -v=2 \ +# RUN: --print-cfg --funcs=main --profile-ignore-hash=0 --infer-stale-profile --profile-use-pseudo-probes --stale-matching-with-block-pseudo-probes 2>&1 | FileCheck %s + +# CHECK: BOLT-INFO: inference found a pseudo probe match for 100.00% of basic blocks (1 out of 1 stale) responsible for -nan% samples (0 out of 0 stale) + +#--- main.s + .text + .globl main # -- Begin function main + .p2align 4, 0x90 + .type main,@function +main: # @main +# %bb.0: + pushq %rbp + movq %rsp, %rbp + movl $0, -4(%rbp) + .pseudoprobe 15822663052811949562 1 0 0 main ---------------- wlei-llvm wrote:
I think this comment is still valid? could you add the testcase to check the feature of inline tree matching? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99891 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
