lukel97 wrote: > > > The run just finished, I'm seeing a 0.75% improvement on 500.perlbench_r > > > on the BPI F3 (-O3 -mcpu=spacemit-x60), no regressions or improvements on > > > the other benchmarks as far as I can see. Seems to check out with the > > > number of memcmps inlined reported for perlbench! > > > > > > Does spacemit-x60 support unaligned scalar memory and was your test with or > > without that enabled? > > > > It supports unaligned scalar but not unaligned vector. And it seems we don't > add these features to `-mcpu=spacemit-x60`. So I think @lukel97 ran the SPEC > without unaligned scalar.
Yeah, -mno-strict-align gave a bus error. I ultimately built it without unaligned scalar since I wasn't sure if unaligned scalar was performant or not. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107548 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
