On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 12:26 +0200, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > Hello again, > > 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In > the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4. >
So I've done a bit more testing this time, that included: Gentoo/amd64, 32-bit multilib on Gentoo/amd64 (only LLVM, Clang and runtimes) and NetBSD/amd64 (LLVM, Clang with tests, everything else build-only). There are no regressions since previous RC. However, I've found one new regression from 8.* (sorry!). To summarize: 1. Stand-alone clang builds are broken when clang-tools-extra is not built: bug [1], patch [2]. If you don't want to include it at this point, I'm just going to carry it downstream. 2. The apparent license incompatibility problem in LLVM is still not resolved [3]. 3. LLDB fails many tests on Gentoo, as usual. [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43281 [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D67452 [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D66390 -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
