Jim,
you're right, I was getting a false positive with -Q, sorry for the
confusion.
So it seems I'm having 2 issues on Xcode, right?
A - No rejection of illegal options (-Q)
B - "-q" with the correct queue name is not working.
Here's what I'm doing for B:
*1 - (lldb) thread info*
thread #1: tid = 0xfc5f, 0x00000001070418f4
ThreadTest`ViewController.viewDidLoad(self=0x00007f940610d270) at
ViewController.swift:16:9, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason =
breakpoint 1.1
*2 - (lldb) breakpoint set --file ViewController.swift --line 26 -q
com.apple.main-thread*
Breakpoint 2: where = ThreadTest`ThreadTest.ViewController.viewDidLoad() ->
() + 942 at ViewController.swift:26:15, address = 0x0000000107041c0e
*3 - (lldb) breakpoint list 2*
2: file = 'ViewController.swift', line = 26, exact_match = 0, locations =
1, resolved = 1, hit count = 0 Options: enabled queue name:
"com.apple.main-thread"
2.1: where = ThreadTest`ThreadTest.ViewController.viewDidLoad() -> () +
942 at ViewController.swift:26:15, address = 0x0000000107041c0e, resolved,
hit count = 0
On #1 I just make sure the queue name is correct, com.apple.main-thread,
then on #2 I set the breakpoint with "-q", and on #3 I make sure that the
parameter was set correctly, and I do see the *enabled queue name:
"com.apple.main-thread" *in there, but the breakpoint is never executed.
But if I set * breakpoint set --file ViewController.swift --line 26*,
without -q, the breakpoint is executed normally.
And to check that the queue name is "com.apple.main-thread" when this
breakpoint is executed I did the following:
*1 - (lldb) breakpoint set --file ViewController.swift --line 26*
Breakpoint 3: where = ThreadTest`ThreadTest.ViewController.viewDidLoad() ->
() + 942 at ViewController.swift:26:15, address = 0x0000000104a01c0e
*2 - (lldb) c*
Process 1242 resuming
*3 - (lldb) thread info*
thread #1: tid = 0x11cd2, 0x0000000104a01c0e
ThreadTest`ViewController.viewDidLoad(self=0x00007fcb15d09d50) at
ViewController.swift:26:15, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason =
breakpoint 3.1
I can verify that on #3 the queue name is in fact com.apple.main-thread but
if I add -q *com.apple.main-thread, *it doesn't work.
At this point, I'm not sure what to do next, maybe file a radar with Apple?
Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it :)
--
Fernando
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 1:27 AM Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
> Fernando, I don't see quite what you do. For me, -Q never sets the
> queue. Rather, the current Xcode version of lldb seems to have a bug where
> it doesn't reject illegal options, so the -Q argument is silently
> discarded. That would cause the breakpoint to "work" but it won't only
> stop on one queue. So I see:
>
>
> (lldb) break set -f main.c -l 10 -q whatever
> Breakpoint 1: where = SomeTool`main + 22 at main.c:13:3, address =
> 0x0000000100000f66
> (lldb) break list 1
> 1: file = 'main.c', line = 10, exact_match = 0, locations = 1, resolved =
> 1, hit count = 0 Options: enabled queue name: "whatever"
> 1.1: where = SomeTool`main + 22 at main.c:13:3, address =
> 0x0000000100000f66, resolved, hit count = 0
>
> That's right, it got the queue name and should match against it. But:
>
> (lldb) break set -f main.c -l 10 -Q whatever
> Breakpoint 2: where = SomeTool`main + 22 at main.c:13:3, address =
> 0x0000000100000f66
> (lldb) break list 2
> 2: file = 'main.c', line = 10, exact_match = 0, locations = 1, resolved =
> 1, hit count = 0
> 2.1: where = SomeTool`main + 22 at main.c:13:3, address =
> 0x0000000100000f66, resolved, hit count = 0
>
> That one didn't get a queue name at all. So it will always stop, but OTOH
> that's not really what you wanted.
>
> It sounds like what is really going on is that the queue matching isn't
> working as you expected, so when you actually DID set a queue name - using
> the "-q" option, the breakpoint wasn't stopping, but when you didn't set a
> queue name (with the bogus -Q option) it did stop. So there might be
> something going wrong with the queue name matching?
>
> Note, this bug doesn't exist in current llvm TOT. If you try with that
> lldb:
>
> (lldb) break set -f foo.c -l 10 -Q foo
> error: unknown or ambiguous option
>
> That's right, there is no -Q option...
>
> I'm surprised we have no tests for rejecting illegal options in the
> command interpreter, but I couldn't find any...
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> > On Jul 18, 2019, at 4:23 PM, Fernando Bunn via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, everyone.
> > I'm seeing an issue when using the -q parameter on a breakpoint using
> Xcode.
> >
> > when I run:
> > (lldb) help breakpoint modify
> > I see this:
> >
> > -q <queue-name> ( --queue-name <queue-name> )
> > The breakpoint stops only for threads in the queue whose
> name is
> > given by this argument.
> >
> > So far, so good.
> > Then I try to set a breakpoint with -q on it like so:
> > (lldb) breakpoint set --file ViewController.swift --line 27 -q
> com.apple.main-thread
> >
> > This doesn't seem to work, but if I use -Q (uppercase), it works just
> fine.
> >
> > I thought that there was a typo somewhere and even had a patch ready to
> submit changing the CommandObjectBreakpoint.cpp file
> > from this:
> > { LLDB_OPT_SET_1, false, "queue-name", 'q',
> OptionParser::eRequiredArgument, nullptr, {}, 0, eArgTypeQueueName, "The
> breakpoint stops only for threads in the queue whose name is given by this
> argument." },
> >
> > to this:
> > { LLDB_OPT_SET_1, false, "queue-name", 'Q',
> OptionParser::eRequiredArgument, nullptr, {}, 0, eArgTypeQueueName, "The
> breakpoint stops only for threads in the queue whose name is given by this
> argument." },
> >
> > but it looks the correct value is being used to switch the parameters:
> > case 'q':
> > m_bp_opts.GetThreadSpec()->SetQueueName(option_arg.str().c_str());
> > break;
> >
> > My question is: why Xcode's version is not respecting the 'q' case?
> > I tested on both:
> > lldb-1100.0.28.6 and lldb-1001.0.13.3 and the same thing happens.
> >
> > Apologies if this is not the best place to ask questions like this, I'd
> appreciate some directions to the correct place If that's the case. Maybe
> file a radar directly on Apple?
> >
> > Thanks for your attention
> > --
> > Fernando
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
