I'm in favor of this. FWIW, I will be surprised if lldb works at all with that option.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:28 AM Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > We have a build option to build LLDB without Python. This option is > automatically set if Cmake can't find or "validate" your Python distribution. > > Since LLDB is rarely built with this option, nobody discovers when this > configuration breaks. For example, if you try it today, you'll get a handful > of missing symbol errors because their declarations are #if'ed out but other > code still references them. > > I'm proposing eliminating this option and fixing the validation of the Python > distribution in LLDBConfig.cmake. > > If you believe LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON is still useful, please speak up, and I'll > instead look at fixing the existing build problems. > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
