We can already say that with OSType::Unknown. That’s different than “i know that no OS exists” On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:00 AM Pavel Labath <pa...@labath.sk> wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 01:22, Jason Molenda via lldb-dev wrote: > > Oh sorry I missed that. Yes, I think a value added to the OSType for > NoOS or something would work. We need to standardize on a textual > representation for this in a triple string as well, like 'none'. Then with > arm64-- and arm64-*-* as UnknownVendor + UnknownOS we can have these marked > as "compatible" with any other value in the case Adrian is looking at. > > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > As another data point, it is usually impossible to tell from looking at > an ELF file which os it is intended to run on. You can tell the > architecture because it's right in the elf header, but that's about it. > Some OSs get around this by adding a special section like > .this.is.an.android.binary, but not all of them. So in general, we need > to be able to say "I have no idea which OS is this binary intended for". > > pl >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
