On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 13:39, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:47:25 +0200, Pavel Labath wrote: > > However, I strongly suspect that you do not want this, > > Right. > > > > *However*, for setting up a new bot, I'd recommend not using this > > particular slave factory (getLLDBScriptCommandsFactory) at all, > > because it's heavily customized for our use case (*), and very > > different from how typical llvm buildbots are set up. You might be > > better off setting up a new factory, which just does the typical > > checkout+build+(optional) test steps, and avoids all of this mess. > > OK. For development of these new steps I guess I should run my own buildbot > master instance? As otherwise that will be probably several/many commits to > zorg repo (+requested buildbot master restarts) and I may screw up something > along.
Yes, that would definitely be the best, but last time I tried that, I couldn't get my master instance to run, for any approximation of the word "run" (which is part of the reason why I haven't done anything about this slave factory, even though I really don't like it).. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
