We don’t want the lowest levels of lldb to depend on clang. If this is useful we should move it from clang to llvm and use llvm::VersionTuple On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:26 AM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> No issues from me. > > > On May 8, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > While moving Args around, I noticed that we have a bunch of > > functions/classes that pass/store version numbers as a triplet of > integers > > (e.g. Platform::GetOSVersion). I got halfway into creating a wrapper > class > > for that when I noticed clang::VersionTuple, which is pretty much what I > > wanted out of the box. > > > > Now there are small differences between this class, and what we have now: > > it has an extra fourth "build" field, and it uses only 31 bits to > represent > > the values. None of these seem to matter (particularly as we are > > converting our representation into this struct in some places) that much, > > but before I go through the trouble of pulling this class into llvm > > (although technically possible, it seems wrong to pull a clang dependency > > at such a low level), I wanted to make sure we are able to use it. > > > > Do you see any reason why we could not replace our version triplets with > > clang::VersionTuple ? > > > > cheers, > > pl > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
