I only briefly scanned the patch, but I'm not sure treating D as another mangling variant of C++ is the best model - I think it will be easier if we gather all the separate language features up in the individual languages. You might have a look at the swift-enabled lldb (https://github.com/apple/swift-lldb/) to see how it is handled there. That's a little weak because we iterate over supported languages by hand. When there were a few that wasn't an issue, but as we pick up more languages, we should introduce a "do over supported languages" feature which would clean up the logic there.
Jim > On Feb 26, 2018, at 9:01 PM, Timothee Cour via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lldb/pull/3 > > it would be *really* nice if llvm or lldb accepted industry standard > github PR's, at least as an option. Would make contributing so much > easier for outsiders > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
