Yes, I can run LLDB under at least ASan and TSan. Pity, the backend part (lldb-server) broke after refactoring the code in recent months. I'm observing an early NULL pointer deference from NetBSD Process Plugin - this is unrelated to the previous stability bugs that inspired me to get the sanitizers aboard.
I will be back to LLDB once I will finish MSan. On 30.11.2017 21:27, Zachary Turner wrote: > Have you been able to run lldb under any sanitizers yet? > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:24 PM Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've finished the LLVM TSan porting: > > https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/the_llvm_thread_sanitizer_has > > Next goal: > Finish MSan followed by the switch to LLDB/NetBSD corrections. > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
