No, there hasn't been a need for this. What commands are you planning to send? Or equivalently, how much state are you expecting to change?
Jim > On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > Is there any way to force lldb to refresh it's internal record of debuggee > process state (as if it had just received a stop event)? I want to send a > custom command to remote gdb process stub (via `process plugin packet send`). > This works, but if the command alters debuggee state, lldb won't know about > it. > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
