Hi everyone, I've filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34194 with a script that produces an LLDB build in the failing configuration and uses it to run a simple test case. Assuming all dependencies for Clang/LLVM/LLDB are installed, reproducing the bug should be as simple as executing the build script.
This seems like a fairly nasty bug (it looks some sort of memory corruption) that effectively breaks the -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON build on Linux. Any help/hints/ideas welcome :) Regards, Tilmann On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Tom Stellard <tstel...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > We've been having trouble with some strange lldb failures when building lldb > with -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON. For example, this command segfaults > with -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON but not if we omit that option: > > echo "int main(void) { return 0; }" | gcc -x c -g - && \ > lldb -b a.out -o 'b main' -o 'r' -o 'expr printf("hello")' > > > Does anyone have a working LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON build and if so, > could you share the cmake flags you are using? > > These are the flags that I used: > > -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release > -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON > -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON > -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON > > Thanks, > Tom _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev