No prob, I scanned those changes and should have noticed the omission at the 
time...

Jim

> On Apr 5, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> That looks like one of my changes. While refactoring the channels (I am done 
> with that now btw), I deleted some unused categories, mostly in the "posix" 
> channel, but this I deleted this one as well..  I didn't call that out 
> explicitly during review, as it seemed easy to add back those that turn out 
> to be needed.
> 
> sorry about the troubles,
> pl
> 
> On 4 April 2017 at 00:22, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> 
> wrote:
> BTW, Jason noticed that somebody had deleted the LIBLLDB_LOG_TEMPORARY log 
> channel.
> 
> Since it looks like one of those things that there's no use for, it's easy to 
> think deleting it is a good cleanup.  But it's actually quite useful as a way 
> to quickly tailor-make a particular set of logs.  Some of the logs (the 
> expression log in particular) are pretty chatty and you just want a subset, 
> and sometimes you want to pick just a few messages from several logs.  You 
> can easily do that by just switching the log channel from whatever log it was 
> to LIBLLDB_LOG_TEMPORARY, and then do "log enable lldb temp".  Then before 
> you check in your code, you can just go revert all the instances of 
> LLDB_LOG_TEMPORARY and you've left the original state untouched.
> 
> Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to