> On Nov 10, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just took a look at our page here: > > http://lldb.llvm.org/download.html <http://lldb.llvm.org/download.html> > > The LLDB Releases section seems pretty out of date. It seems like we could > correct that via a few different ways: > > * Remove the LLDB Releases section - this would eliminate the appearance of > us keeping it up to date (i.e. match what looks to be reality). > > * Start keeping it up to date, at least for the groups that are in fact > making occasional builds available. > > * Coordinate with the LLVM folks that do the LLVM binaries, figure out what > we need to do to make that happen, and maybe have this page link to the LLVM > downloads page.
My 2 cents: I’d like to see lldb getting more of a first class citizen (alongside with Clang) in the LLVM project. So having it as part of the LLVM release makes sense to me, at least on the medium term. Best, — Mehdi > > * For those buildbots that do produce usable packages, we could link from > here to the build jobs, possibly with a little text on how to make use of it. > > * Something else? > > Any opinions here? Clearly some of those options above imply work by some, > so getting generating usable images generated still may be on a maintainer > opt-in basis. I'm just looking to see us clean up the communication on this > page: > > http://lldb.llvm.org/download.html <http://lldb.llvm.org/download.html> > > just as a matter of settings expectations for those who land there. > > Thanks for any thoughts on this! > -- > -Todd > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
