I see one usage of of chrono in the Fuzzer, and that's about it.
On 6 October 2016 at 17:46, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote:
> I'd love to move over to chrono. For Utility functions such as those you
> propose probably we should consider whether they should go into llvm. Does
> llvm currently use anything from chrono or have any chrono support
> functions yet?
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:39 PM Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> in line with the "deinventing the wheel" movement, I'd like to remove the
>> TimeValue class from LLDB. I've done some research on a flight this week,
>> and as far as I can tell all functionality can be easily replaced with
>> appropriate usage of std::chrono::duration and time_point.
>>
>> The only parts that are missing are the ability to convert to/from legacy
>> C types (struct timevalue, struct timespec), which can be replaced by
>> utility functions.
>>
>> Also, I've found one use case particularly cumbersome to write in the c++
>> way: writing out a duration as a fractional number of units (e.g.
>> milliseconds). So, I'd propose adding the following utility function as
>> well (unless someone knows a cleaner way to write this):
>>
>> template<typename DurOut, typename DurIn>
>> double float_duration(DurIn dur) {
>> return std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::duration<double,
>> DurOut::period>>(dur).count();
>> }
>>
>> Then, you can write float_duration<milliseconds>(dur) to get the
>> duration as a fractional number of milliseconds (used in printing time
>> deltas in a human readable fashion).
>>
>> Any thoughts or objections?
>>
>> pl
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
