> On Jul 8, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 8 July 2016 at 17:45, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.am...@apple.com> wrote: >> You missed the point that in a single instance of LNT a revision number has >> to be unique. >> The rev-list thing won't provide this across branches. >> A rev-list count number won't identify a revision, you need the tuple >> (branch, count), which is less easy or less compatible with existing systems. > > What about git describe?
Not a number. — Mehdi _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
