Hi Pavel, Thanks for your answer! At least I know it’s not supposed to work as is. I’ll see if I can do something similar to what you guys did for Android platforms.
Thanks again! Cheers, - Adrien Duermael > On Jun 29, 2016, at 5:07 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > > Hi Adrien, > > I think your diagnosis is correct here. LLDB does indeed create an additional > connection to the gdb-server instance which is started by the platform > instance when you start debugging. In case of android platforms we already > include code to forward this port automatically, but there is no such thing > for linux -- we just expect the server to be reachable. > > Unfortunately, there is no way to control this behavior at the moment. I > suppose you could unblock all ports on the container, but make sure that they > are only reachable from the host (I know that's not ideal). > > cheers, > pl > > > On 22 June 2016 at 19:18, Adrien Duermael via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve been trying to run lldb-server from within a linux container lately. > > When I try to attach from outside the container using lldb command, most > steps are successful but I can’t launch the process: > > platform select remote-linux 👍 > platform connect connect://IP:PORT <> 👍 > target create main 👍 > process launch ❌ > > My guess is that the container only exposes the control port, the one I’m > listening to with lldb-server p --listen *:PORT. > And it seems that ports are dynamically allocated to then handle process > debugging. > > I don’t want my container to expose too many ports, as I usually have in fact > only one debuggable process running inside. > (I tried, I can launch my process if the container exposes all ports) > > Is there a way to set a range for these dynamically allocated ports using > lldb-server? > > I can’t find it in the docs, and help command can’t help me either: > Usage: > lldb-server p [--log-file log-file-name] [--log-channels log-channel-list] > [--port-file port-file-path] --server --listen port > > Also, is there an option to use unix sockets instead of ports? > > Thanks for your help! > > - Adrien Duermael > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev> > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
