On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > That's what concerns me about going to the scheme Richard and Rafael > suggested, of bumping the major version each time: we'd release 4.0, > and would Tom's dot-release then be 4.1? That would be confusing to > those who are used to our current scheme. Chris suggested going > straight to 40 to avoid this, but that also seems a bit extreme.
Extreme how? What do you mean by “extreme"? -Chris _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
