On 13 Jun 2016, at 15:24, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +1. My understanding is that 2.9->3.0 came with some huge internal changes > (overhaul of the type system, maybe? this slightly predates my involvement > with LLVM so I'm not entirely sure) and warranted a major-version change > regardless of the .9->.0 thing.
1->2 also came with a fairly fundamental change (removal of signed and unsigned integer types, addition of signed and unsigned integer operations). > I don't think 3.10 should be confusing to anyone, really. The version > number is a tuple, not a string or a decimal fraction. Agreed. David _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
