> On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:42 AM, via lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Yeah, I get that and I actually don't mind keeping a linear history. > But we definitely should branch for release. Given release branches, > there are a number of questions and tradeoffs about how to backport > changes from master/latest development to a release. Some of those > options break linear history. This is the kind of workflow stuff we > should clarify if possible.
+1 for branching for official llvm.org releases, and each branch should have its own linear history (from its branch point). I don’t think we want people’s random projects and development branches on llvm.org. They can clone to repo off to their own fork on github and do what they want there. -Chris _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
