> On Jun 2, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Brian Cain <brian.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Tanya Lattner via cfe-dev >> <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I personally find this email thread very hard to follow and read (this isn’t >> anyones fault.. its just a lot of replies). I am sure others do as well. I >> think it would be good to have a form/survey of some sort that can get >> feedback from users such as: who they are, how they use >> LLVM/contributions/etc, if they are pro-github move, how it impacts them, >> etc. People could then submit their feedback in an organized way and we >> could get a better idea of how the community feels on the topic. > > > While I sympathize, I wonder if a survey is appropriate. It gives equal > weight to all voices but not all voices are equally impacted by the > pros/cons. I am in favor of a github/lab/etc transition but I've only lurked > on the list and built/tested a couple of releases for older platforms. I > would think opinions of those who have lots of work with > commits/reviews/content should probably be weighed heavier than mine. > Perhaps the survey could ask for a voluntary high/medium/low activity level > for normalizing the votes? > Yes that's what I meant about asking for information about how they use LLVM and contributions. It would not be an anonymous survey. I just was thinking it would be better to have an organized way of getting votes/opinions without all the emails and discussion. I think discussion is important of course but it can be hard to follow everything and for some to chime in. Anyways, just an idea. -Tanya > -- > -Brian
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
