On 1 June 2016 at 05:16, Douglas Gregor <dgre...@apple.com> wrote: > Performance can also be an issue; it takes a bunch of fast bots to keep up > with developers testing their pull requests, especially when what you’re > testing is a very large C++ code base. That said, “test and merge on success” > workflows are *wonderful* for keeping the buildbots happy.
Indeed. These pre-commit machines have to be dedicated, and we may have to have more than one, depending on the volume. But the good news is that they can scale independently, and they'll remove a huge strain from the current buildbots. Also, I think it's easier to justify (commercially) a few additional pre-commit bots than duplicating every single configuration I have today. cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
