On 30 January 2016 at 00:13, William Dillon <will...@housedillon.com> wrote: > In a very real sense, no information is lost here. That is exactly the reason why it looks very hackish. :)
It looks to me like you are trying to work around some other bug, probably in the code that consumes the triple. Could you point me to the code that consumes that triple? Couldn't that be fixed to look at triple.getSubArch() instead of it's string representation? > Would it make you more comfortable is this patch was rewritten within > HostInfoLinux::ComputeHostArchitectureSupport alongside the massaging of the > vendor name for linux? If this is Linux-specific, then HostInfoLinux is definitely a better place for it. However, I would like to understand this a bit deeper first... pl _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
