On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Brian Cain <brian.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Brian Cain via cfe-dev < >> cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11SP3 x86_64 >>> >>> Looks like I see several failures that weren't in 3.7.1. Is there any >>> way to tell whether these are regressions vs new-to-3.8.0-but-failing? The >>> MSan ones were in 3.7.1 but the ThreadPoolTest and the libc++ errors were >>> not in 3.7.1. >>> >>> >> All of the libc++ failures seem like non-issues and should be in 3.7.1. >> Did you change or upgrade your platform or libc version? I'm not sure >> about the libc++abi error though. >> > > I don't recall any changes to libc. Attached is the testing log from > 3.7.1 rc2 (I don't have logs from -final handy). > > I can repeat a 3.7.1 release build on this system now. I don't think the > results will change, though. > > I discussed this more with Eric off-list and I think we've come to the conclusion that this was not a regression, it was my error. It's a bit tricky -- what should I expect for a new platform? All failing tests are likely failing because they can't be/aren't yet supported? It's tough to distinguish -- are they real bugs to be fixed, errors in the build/release process?
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
