Excellent. I'll try this in the afternoon. I need to run out now but I'll check in what we discussed later on when I get back.
Thanks! On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ying Chen <chy...@google.com> wrote: > Yes, you could use android builder to run that experiment. > Please watch test 7 of this builder > <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-android/> after > your change goes in(Another test for aarch64 which was previously timed out > has been disabled for offline debugging of other unrelated problems). > > Thanks, > Ying > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> (And, as an aside, I may just nuke the serial test runner anyway, since >> we can do it with a multi-worker runner with a single worker just fine, and >> reduce the code size --- I really don't see a good reason to keep the >> serial test runner strategy anymore except for a purely theoretical sense). >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ying, >>> >>> I am speculating that the rerun logic issue where we saw the hang may be >>> more of a serial test runner issue. Would you mind if I re-enabled the >>> arm/aarch64 inclusion in the rerun logic now that I made a change based on >>> this speculation? It would be a relatively quick way to check if the >>> serial test runner is the issue, since now the rerun logic will not use the >>> serial test runner but rather the normal parallel runner with a single >>> worker (so, the same intent but expressed another way, using the test >>> runners we use all the time). If we still hit the issue, it is unrelated >>> to the serial test runner strategy. If we don't see the issue, then: (1) >>> great, we have a solution, and (2) I know I need to look into the serial >>> test runner strategy which may need some updates for recent changes. >>> >>> How does that sound? If I enable it and it times out, I'll just revert >>> the change and we'll go back to normal. (And I'll know more about the >>> issue, albeit with more investigation necessary). If it works just fine, >>> we'll leave it this way (and I'll know I need to look into the serial test >>> runner). >>> >>> -- >>> -Todd >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -Todd >> > > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
