LLDBWrapPython.cpp <LLDBWrapPython.cpphttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzpf8QJC6OGOc0RZNGY1dEhBZzQ/view?usp=sharing> lldb.py <lldb.pyhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzpf8QJC6OGOaEVaNF9GY0tPXzg/view?usp=sharing>
Double check the top of lldb.py to make sure swig_version = (3,0,x) On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:14 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> > wrote: > >> Can I send you a sample set of bindings generated by 3.x as a fail-fast >> test? Try them out, see if anything breaks, etc? >> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:07 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Zachary, >>> >>> Please make sure to ping Greg Clayton, particularly if it does anything >>> that would make the binding no longer be C-linkage-compatible. He can tell >>> you all the bits we are counting on. I think the keys are: >>> >>> * we don't ever have there be vtables. >>> * we never remove API surface area. >>> * we don't change signatures of existing API. >>> >>> but I don't think that's exhaustive and certainly not authoritative. >>> >>> Anyways, just make sure you sync up with him so you don't end up wasting >>> any energy on something that will break some kind of requirement we have. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> -- >>> -Todd >>> >> > > > -- > -Todd >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
