Will do!
> From: lab...@google.com > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:40:28 +0100 > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Thread resumes with stale signal after executing > InferiorCallMmap > To: eugen...@hotmail.com > CC: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org; jing...@apple.com > > Sure, fair enough. > > If you have made a small repro case already though, it would be great > if you could file a bug about it, so we don't forget it. > > pl > > On 12 October 2015 at 23:23, Eugene Birukov <eugen...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I tried to repro it using standard LLDB client on a simple program that I > > could share. Well, the problem does not exactly repro as in my case - i.e. > > the signal is not re-delivered to the thread. But LLDB does get confused > > state: the program continues but at the same time lldb shows its prompt as > > if the program were stopped. I.e. the recovery from signal during expression > > evaluation is buggy. Sorry, I am not sure that I will have time to look into > > it deeper - it is not a blocker for me at this time. > > > >> From: lab...@google.com > >> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:25:45 +0100 > >> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Thread resumes with stale signal after executing > >> InferiorCallMmap > >> To: eugen...@hotmail.com > >> CC: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org; jing...@apple.com > >> > >> On 8 October 2015 at 17:08, Eugene Birukov <eugen...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > Yes, that's exactly what I see, thanks a lot! > >> You're wellcome. > >> > >> > > >> > Does it explain why I see SIGILL reappear when I let process continue > >> > after > >> > mmap execution? I.e. do I need to look into this more? > >> No. That could still be a bug somewhere. Feel free to look into it.. > >> > >> pl
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev