Okay, thanks. It would be awesome if the summary listed the specific versions of clang being used. TOT is obvious, but "clang" being 3.5 is less so.
Seeing as clang behavior can change between releases, perhaps we can use the other slots for other clang versions? TOT clearly makes sense if more than one is being done. But if 4 slots could be dedicated to clang, it seems like: TOT (latest, 3.8 now) TOT - 1 (3.7) TOT - 2 (3.6) TOT - 3 (3.5) Or perhaps: TOT (latest, 3.8) TOT - 1 (3.7) TOT - 2 (3.6) TOT - *HISTORICALLY INTERESTING CLANG* (perhaps 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, whatever). Just some thoughts. Nice that the tests run so fast. I've only got them running in 2.5 minutes here, looks like your build bot does it in 1.5 :-) -Todd On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Chaoren Lin <chaor...@google.com> wrote: > We gave each bot 8 slots due to some limitation with the build master. > Slots 1-6 will notify us of failures, and slots 7-8 are sort of reserved > for tests/builds that are expected to be broken. Ying can provide more > details. > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Chaoren, >> >> While looking at the Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 build bot, I was looking at the >> test configurations for the test slots. 6 of them are described in the >> build summary on the upper right >> <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/6281> >> There >> is a 7th and 8th test slot that are not described --- what happens in those >> slots? Are they just unconfigured and thus not used? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Todd >> > > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
