Okay. So the culprit then is that I'm using: cmake -GNinja ../llvm
with one extra flag for build type. And cmake is then just choosing /usr/bin/cc. We could improve this by having the compiler symbolic links fully resolved: /usr/bin/cc -> /etc/alternatives/cc -> /usr/bin/gcc, which would have then caught that it doesn't support libc++. Couldn't we use gcc with libc++? (i.e. is it sufficient to assume we don't have libc++ if we're using gcc?) I have never tried that combo but I don't know that it is impossible. (After all, I just added libc++-dev to the system, which presumably I can link against). On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Tamas Berghammer <tbergham...@google.com> wrote: > In theory the test should be skipped when you are using gcc (cc is an > alias for it) but we detect the type of the compiler based on the > executable name and in case of cc we don't recognize that it is a gcc, so > we don't skip the test. > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:45 PM Chaoren Lin via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> You're using CC="/usr/bin/cc". It needs to be clang for USE_LIBCPP to do >> anything. :/ >> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here are a couple of the failures that came up (the log output from the >>> full dosep.py run). >>> >>> Let me know if that is not sufficient! >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> There's no need to do anything fancy (yet :) ). For initial diagnosis >>>> the output of `./dotest.py $your_usual_options -p SomeLibcxxTest.py >>>> -t` should suffice. >>>> >>>> pl >>>> >>>> On 25 August 2015 at 16:45, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Thanks, Pavel! I'll dig that up and get back. >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> There is no separate option, it should just work. :) >>>> >> >>>> >> I'm betting you are still missing some package there (we should >>>> >> document the prerequisites better). Could you send the error message >>>> >> you are getting so we can have a look. >>>> >> >>>> >> cheers, >>>> >> pl >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On 25 August 2015 at 16:20, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev >>>> >> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Chaoren Lin <chaor...@google.com >>>> > >>>> >> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> The TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests require libc++-dev: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> $ sudo apt-get install libc++-dev >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to >>>> hear. >>>> >> >> Pre-14.04 I gave up on it. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Will cmake automatically choose libc++ if it is present? Or do I >>>> need >>>> >> >> to >>>> >> >> pass something to cmake to use libc++? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Hmm it appears I need to do more than just install libc++-dev. I >>>> did a >>>> >> > clean build with that installed, then ran the tests, and I still >>>> have >>>> >> > the >>>> >> > Libcxc/Libcxx tests failing. Is there some flag expected, either >>>> to >>>> >> > pass >>>> >> > along for the compile options to dotest.py to override/specify >>>> which c++ >>>> >> > lib >>>> >> > it is using? >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Thanks, Chaoren! >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> -Todd >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev >>>> >> >>> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner < >>>> ztur...@google.com> >>>> >> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we >>>> have a >>>> >> >>>>> good handle on the unexpected successes. I only added that >>>> >> >>>>> information to >>>> >> >>>>> the output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes >>>> were >>>> >> >>>>> actually >>>> >> >>>>> going unnoticed. >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Okay, thanks Zachary. A while back we had some flapping tests >>>> that >>>> >> >>>> would oscillate between unexpected success and failure on Linux. >>>> >> >>>> Some of >>>> >> >>>> those might still be in that state but maybe (!) are fixed. >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Anyone on the Linux end who happens to know if the fails in >>>> >> >>>> particular >>>> >> >>>> look normal, that'd be good to know. >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove the >>>> XFAIL >>>> >> >>>>> from those tests. >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev >>>> >> >>>>> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> I'm just trying to get a handle on current lldb test failures >>>> >> >>>>>> across >>>> >> >>>>>> different platforms. >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the >>>> failures >>>> >> >>>>>> below on Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this: >>>> >> >>>>>> * stock linker (ld.bfd), >>>> >> >>>>>> * g++ 4.9.2 >>>> >> >>>>>> * cmake >>>> >> >>>>>> * ninja >>>> >> >>>>>> * libstdc++ >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> ninja check-lldb output: >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (15 failed) (3.807107%) >>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (17 failed) (3.586498%) >>>> >> >>>>>> Failing Tests (15) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux rad >>>> 3.13.0-57-generic >>>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py >>>> (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py >>>> (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py >>>> (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux >>>> rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux >>>> rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic >>>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic >>>> >> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (10) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux >>>> rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py >>>> (Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py >>>> (Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py >>>> (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py >>>> (Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> rad 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC >>>> 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux >>>> rad >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> On a similar setup, although bumped up to Ubuntu 14.04.3 and >>>> now on >>>> >> >>>>>> a >>>> >> >>>>>> VMWare VM, everything else the same, I see a similar report >>>> from >>>> >> >>>>>> 'ninja >>>> >> >>>>>> check-lldb': >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (17 failed) (4.314721%) >>>> >> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (19 failed) (4.008439%) >>>> >> >>>>>> Failing Tests (17) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestAttachResume.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux lldb >>>> 3.19.0-26-generic >>>> >> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 >>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py >>>> (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py >>>> (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py >>>> (Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux >>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux >>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux >>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux >>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic >>>> >> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 >>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepOverWatchpoint.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (11) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux >>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py >>>> (Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py >>>> (Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py >>>> (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py >>>> (Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 >>>> 14:09:17 >>>> >> >>>>>> UTC 2015 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux >>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux >>>> lldb >>>> >> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 >>>> UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 >>>> >> >>>>>> x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: >>>> TestWatchedVarHitWhenInScope.py >>>> >> >>>>>> (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug >>>> 12 >>>> >> >>>>>> 14:09:17 UTC >>>> >> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64) >>>> >> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> Do these more or less match the current state of affairs for >>>> Linux >>>> >> >>>>>> tests? If not, are there any suggestions on best practices >>>> for >>>> >> >>>>>> upgrades? A >>>> >> >>>>>> while back I had tried things like clang and libc++ but I had >>>> >> >>>>>> arrived at the >>>> >> >>>>>> above setup (albeit typically with the gold linker) simply >>>> due to >>>> >> >>>>>> what >>>> >> >>>>>> worked, what was easy to debug and what built fast. >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> Thanks for any confirmation on that! >>>> >> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>> -- >>>> >> >>>>>> -Todd >>>> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> >>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list >>>> >> >>>>>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >>>> >> >>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> -- >>>> >> >>>> -Todd >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> >>>> lldb-dev mailing list >>>> >> >>>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >>>> >> >>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> -- >>>> >> >> -Todd >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > -Todd >>>> >> > >>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>> >> > lldb-dev mailing list >>>> >> > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >>>> >> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > -Todd >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -Todd >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
