================
@@ -2076,7 +2077,11 @@ bool CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(const char
*command_line,
}
ElapsedTime elapsed(execute_time);
- cmd_obj->Execute(remainder.c_str(), result);
+ size_t nchar = real_original_command_string.find(remainder);
+ std::optional<uint16_t> pos_in_cmd;
+ if (nchar != std::string::npos)
+ pos_in_cmd = nchar + GetDebugger().GetPrompt().size();
+ cmd_obj->Execute(remainder.c_str(), pos_in_cmd, result);
----------------
adrian-prantl wrote:
I can (and I thought the same thing as I was making the change), but I want to
make sure that's the right API design. Reducing the size of the patch isn't
necessarily a priority for me. Do we think that hiding the parameter in the
object is a better design?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106470
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
