slydiman wrote: > Ok, so if I'm reading this right you're saying you saw no ETXTBSY errors with > the current implementation --server flag. Is that correct ?
Right. Initially I have marked #100670 as dependent on this. Ok, agreed. So, we can try to use O_CLOFORK. And simple solution is to call execve() as fast as possible and wait some time in case of ETXTBSY (this PR). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100659 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
