================
@@ -46,8 +48,79 @@ SaveCoreOptions::GetOutputFile() const {
return m_file;
}
+Status SaveCoreOptions::SetProcess(lldb::ProcessSP process_sp) {
+ Status error;
+ if (!process_sp) {
+ ClearProcessSpecificData();
+ m_process_sp = std::nullopt;
+ return error;
+ }
+
+ if (!process_sp->IsValid()) {
+ error.SetErrorString("Cannot assign an invalid process.");
+ return error;
+ }
+
+ if (m_process_sp.has_value())
+ ClearProcessSpecificData();
+
+ m_process_sp = process_sp;
+ return error;
+}
+
+Status SaveCoreOptions::AddThread(lldb_private::Thread *thread) {
+ Status error;
+ if (!thread) {
+ error.SetErrorString("Thread is null");
+ }
+
+ if (!m_process_sp.has_value())
+ m_process_sp = thread->GetProcess();
+
+ if (m_process_sp.value() != thread->GetProcess()) {
+ error.SetErrorString("Cannot add thread from a different process.");
+ return error;
+ }
+
+ std::pair<lldb::tid_t, lldb::ThreadSP> tid_pair(thread->GetID(),
+ thread->GetBackingThread());
+ m_threads_to_save.insert(tid_pair);
+ return error;
+}
+
+bool SaveCoreOptions::RemoveThread(lldb_private::Thread *thread) {
+ return thread && m_threads_to_save.erase(thread->GetID()) > 0;
+}
+
+bool SaveCoreOptions::ShouldSaveThread(lldb::tid_t tid) const {
----------------
Jlalond wrote:
I didn't call it `ThreadShouldBeSaved` I worded it more like a predicate
`ShouldThreadBeSaved`. I like this more personally, but I'm not an expert in
the codebase convention so please let me know if `ThreadShouldBeSaved` is more
fitting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100443
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
