slydiman wrote: > Agreed, so silent UB would just be making things worse.
So, this patch fixes that issue, right? > Perhaps I am spelling the port option differently, or you mean a lldb-server > gdbserver launched by a platform ignores the port. It seems it depends on the system. Note I'm working on a patch to fix #97537 and all port mapping related issues. The idea is to use threads for platform mode and use a common port map for all connections instead of making a new `portmap_for_child` with 1 port. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98833 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
