labath wrote:
I'm not sure if these names come from the demangler or debug info, but windows
has different implementations for both, so it not surprising they're different.
Assuming we don't care about the precise formatting of the names, we could
just check whether the name of the function is `in` the string (and change the
name to something more unique): `assertIn("my_first_step_target",
step_in_targets[0]["label"])`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96687
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
