labath wrote:

Can't say I'm excited to see this feature (although I admit it is looking less 
daunting than I originally feared).  Can you explain why you need this feature? 
Is there some particular aspect of lldb's remote operation that you think isn't 
well covered by the existing tests? Is there a particular category of tests 
that you'd like to have more than other? How many of the existing tests would 
actually exercise the remote platform capability in a meaningful way (a lot of 
these tests don't even build runnable binaries)?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95986
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to