dwblaikie wrote: > Good question, I haven't dug into the modules import mechanism yet, but if > this is true, then that could give us an opportunity to introduce a "lazy > method loading" mechanism on the ExternalASTSource that would fit both LLDB > and modules? Will try to confirm this (unless someone else knows the answer > to this already, e.g., @dwblaikie).
Yeah, I don't have any great info here - only the vague assumption/understanding that this path was more modules-aligned, and so perf improvements for lldb could also be perf improvements (& test coverage) for modules... - but I could be wrong on that conception. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95100 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
