================
@@ -975,6 +975,219 @@ ConvertDWARFCallingConventionToClang(const
ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes &attrs) {
return clang::CC_C;
}
+bool DWARFASTParserClang::ParseObjCMethod(
+ const ObjCLanguage::MethodName &objc_method, const DWARFDIE &die,
+ CompilerType clang_type, const ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes &attrs,
+ bool is_variadic) {
+ SymbolFileDWARF *dwarf = die.GetDWARF();
+ const auto tag = die.Tag();
+ ConstString class_name(objc_method.GetClassName());
+ if (!class_name)
+ return false;
+
+ TypeSP complete_objc_class_type_sp(
+ dwarf->FindCompleteObjCDefinitionTypeForDIE(DWARFDIE(), class_name,
----------------
felipepiovezan wrote:
should we write this as an assignment instead? It is the same thing, but at
least the code is consistent with how other variables are initialized
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95078
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
