JDevlieghere wrote: > I'm also not sure the number of operands is ever useful without having the > encoding ready, but maybe for DIExpression it actually is (because there we > always use the same encoding).
Yeah, I came to the same conclusion, which is why LLDB isn't using the data. I primarily added it to avoid mistakes where someone confuses the number of operands with the arity. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94679 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
