ostannard wrote: @davemgreen This is already split into 18 commits, I don't think there's any reason to split it into 18 PRs, since comments on one of them likely apply to the others.
@tmatheson-arm I don't know if there's any more specific precedent for changing target feature names, but I think this will be a breaking change for existing bitcode files, which we do try to maintain backward compatibility with: https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility. Maybe we could add IR auto-upgrade code to handle old bitcode? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90320 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
