jimingham wrote: We don't do the latter anywhere. This is really equivalent to the: target.breakpoints-use-platform-avoid-list setting, which is also about "stop at places most normal human beings don't want to stop". In the extant setting it's about whole libraries, the new setting would be about adding breakpoints on artificial line table entries or something like that.
Jim > On Mar 4, 2024, at 3:45 PM, Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan ***@***.***> wrote: > > > Also, are these 100% uninteresting line table entries? At present, there's no > way to get lldb to not filter them out, so they either really need to be > totally uninteresting, or we need a setting to turn them back on again. > > They should be 100% uninteresting, but I agree that it would be nice to have > a mechanism allowing these to be re-enabled. > Do you think it is better to have a setting for this, or could we perhaps add > the breakpoint but keep it disabled by default (is there precedent for this?) > ? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83908#issuecomment-1977664034>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUPVWYSKO52SMUY5VPMTF3YWUBRLAVCNFSM6AAAAABEF5NXPGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZXGY3DIMBTGQ>. > You are receiving this because your review was requested. > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83908 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
