================ @@ -227,7 +265,7 @@ class ThreadPool { class ThreadPoolTaskGroup { ---------------- aganea wrote:
That point was raised by the OP in the Discourse thread (allow for custom implementations of `ThreadPoolTaskGroup`) and I think it deserved a clear answer, and I do agree now to your point. Until there's no clear use-case, the behavior of `ThreadPoolTaskGroup` will remain as is, deferred to the `ThreadPool` implementation. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82094 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits