mordante wrote:

> > I see you implemented this code only for C++26. In general we retroactively 
> > apply LWG issues to all previous standard versions. Is there a reason why 
> > you only applied this to C++26?
> 
> I am not familiar with this process. I'm happy to do what's needed to be 
> done. So I assume I need to remove the version guards and test against the 
> original implementation?

Yes that is the general rule for LWG-issues. The other implementations handle 
them in the same fashion.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78215
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to