================
@@ -978,8 +978,14 @@ void Editline::DisplayCompletions(
break;
fprintf(editline.m_output_file, "More (Y/n/a): ");
- char reply = 'n';
- int got_char = el_getc(editline.m_editline, &reply);
+ // The type for the output and the type for the parameter are different,
+ // to allow interoperability with older versions of libedit. The container
+ // for the reply must be as wide as what our implementation is using,
+ // but libedit may use a narrower type depending on the build
+ // configuration.
+ EditLineGetCharType reply = L'n';
+ int got_char = el_wgetc(editline.m_editline,
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
Why does this use `el_wgetc` instead of us switching based on
`LLDB_EDITLINE_USE_WCHAR`? I'm not too familiar with editline, but it seems
strange to me that we would use `el_wgetc` even if there's no `wchar_t` support.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75388
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
